Fix a formula with fraction 1/2 in subscript mode










8















At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



enter image description here



In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



Here my MWE for 2nd image:



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools

begindocument
beginequation
T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation

beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
endequation

enddocument









share|improve this question




























    8















    At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



    enter image description here



    In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



    We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



    Here my MWE for 2nd image:



    enter image description here



    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
    usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
    usepackagemathtools

    begindocument
    beginequation
    T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
    endequation

    beginequation
    N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
    endequation

    enddocument









    share|improve this question


























      8












      8








      8








      At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



      enter image description here



      In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



      We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



      Here my MWE for 2nd image:



      enter image description here



      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
      usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
      usepackagemathtools

      begindocument
      beginequation
      T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
      endequation

      beginequation
      N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
      endequation

      enddocument









      share|improve this question
















      At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



      enter image description here



      In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



      We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



      Here my MWE for 2nd image:



      enter image description here



      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
      usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
      usepackagemathtools

      begindocument
      beginequation
      T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
      endequation

      beginequation
      N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
      endequation

      enddocument






      math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 13 '18 at 9:48







      Sebastiano

















      asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:41









      SebastianoSebastiano

      9,58441858




      9,58441858




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



          You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

          newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu

          begindocument

          beginequation
          T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
          endequation

          beginequation
          N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
          N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
          endequation

          enddocument


          I wouldn't touch the slash.



          enter image description here



          I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






          share|improve this answer
































            1














            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
            usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
            usepackagemathtools
            usepackagenicefrac

            begindocument
            beginequation
            T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
            endequation

            beginequation
            N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
            endequation

            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer






















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "85"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              8














              The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



              You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



              documentclassarticle
              usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

              newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu

              begindocument

              beginequation
              T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
              endequation

              beginequation
              N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
              N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
              endequation

              enddocument


              I wouldn't touch the slash.



              enter image description here



              I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






              share|improve this answer





























                8














                The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



                You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

                newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu

                begindocument

                beginequation
                T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                endequation

                beginequation
                N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
                N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
                endequation

                enddocument


                I wouldn't touch the slash.



                enter image description here



                I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






                share|improve this answer



























                  8












                  8








                  8







                  The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



                  You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

                  newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu

                  begindocument

                  beginequation
                  T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                  endequation

                  beginequation
                  N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
                  N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
                  endequation

                  enddocument


                  I wouldn't touch the slash.



                  enter image description here



                  I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






                  share|improve this answer















                  The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



                  You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

                  newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu

                  begindocument

                  beginequation
                  T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                  endequation

                  beginequation
                  N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
                  N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
                  endequation

                  enddocument


                  I wouldn't touch the slash.



                  enter image description here



                  I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 12 '18 at 23:27

























                  answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:09









                  egregegreg

                  715k8619003187




                  715k8619003187





















                      1














                      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
                      usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
                      usepackagemathtools
                      usepackagenicefrac

                      begindocument
                      beginequation
                      T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                      endequation

                      beginequation
                      N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
                      endequation

                      enddocument


                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
                        usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
                        usepackagemathtools
                        usepackagenicefrac

                        begindocument
                        beginequation
                        T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                        endequation

                        beginequation
                        N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
                        endequation

                        enddocument


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
                          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
                          usepackagemathtools
                          usepackagenicefrac

                          begindocument
                          beginequation
                          T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                          endequation

                          beginequation
                          N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
                          endequation

                          enddocument


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer













                          documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
                          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
                          usepackagemathtools
                          usepackagenicefrac

                          begindocument
                          beginequation
                          T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
                          endequation

                          beginequation
                          N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
                          endequation

                          enddocument


                          enter image description here







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:50









                          danieldaniel

                          1




                          1



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Darth Vader #20

                              How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

                              Ondo