Fix a formula with fraction 1/2 in subscript mode
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginequation
T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
endequation
enddocument
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
add a comment |
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginequation
T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
endequation
enddocument
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
add a comment |
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginequation
T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
endequation
enddocument
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginequation
T_1/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_1/2=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_1/2=N_02^-fractT_1/2
endequation
enddocument
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
edited Nov 13 '18 at 9:48
Sebastiano
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:41
SebastianoSebastiano
9,58441858
9,58441858
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu
begindocument
beginequation
T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
endequation
enddocument
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
add a comment |
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenicefrac
begindocument
beginequation
T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
endequation
enddocument
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu
begindocument
beginequation
T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
endequation
enddocument
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
add a comment |
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu
begindocument
beginequation
T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
endequation
enddocument
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
add a comment |
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu
begindocument
beginequation
T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
endequation
enddocument
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
newcommandonemspace-1mu1mspace-1.5mu
begindocument
beginequation
T_one/2=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_one/2=
N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_one/2=N_02^-fractT_one/2
endequation
enddocument
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
edited Nov 12 '18 at 23:27
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:09
egregegreg
715k8619003187
715k8619003187
add a comment |
add a comment |
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenicefrac
begindocument
beginequation
T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
endequation
enddocument
add a comment |
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenicefrac
begindocument
beginequation
T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
endequation
enddocument
add a comment |
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenicefrac
begindocument
beginequation
T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
endequation
enddocument
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]book
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenicefrac
begindocument
beginequation
T_nicefrac12=frac ln 2lambda=tau ln 2<tau
endequation
beginequation
N(t)=N_0e^-fractln 2T_nicefrac12=N_0e^ln 2^-frac tT_nicefrac12=N_02^-fractT_nicefrac12
endequation
enddocument
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:50
danieldaniel
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown